You know, I keep thinking about how I speak about Teach when
people ask me about my son’s school. It
seems as though we have been somehow gently pressured into making less of our
kids and our school in public. As if
we’re supposed not to say that our kids are smarter than other kids because
it’s not nice to the other people’s kids.
The parents of the students at Teach have always worked their asses off
so that their special children could have special opportunities. Because they deserve it and we want it for
them. I wonder if this sortof
apologetic, my-kid-isn’t-better-than-any-other-kid thing has leaked out onto
our collective enthusiasm with respect to school events and fundraising in
particular.
I was having a conversation with a home-schooling neighbor
who asked me about Teach. I heard the
things I said to her and wondered if I was being too p.c. She says she has a smart kid. She wants him to have “enrichment” in his
education. Why I shouldn’t I say, “You
kid is smart…he should go to Teach! That’s
a great place for kids who want enrichment!
We offer so much more than any other local school!”
She said, “Is it free?”
I thought for a second.
I mean, nothing in life is
free, right? I explained about how much
the “enrichment” costs, around $800 per child.
I explained that we contribute as families, but not everyone can, so we
generously work as Boosters to ensure that all the kids can have it, even if
their families are too poor or too lazy to contribute. “Poor” and “lazy” are negative terms, but in
only 4 letters more concisely describe families who just can’t seem to swing an
extra $800 each year for each child or who don’t feel like they should have to
do anything since their school is publicly funded or they are just ignoring the
way the whole thing works. But, yeah,
it’s free. I don’t know if it’s the
school for her, but it’s the school for me.
Where else can you get so much for only $800 a year? It’s probably not the best possible school,
but it’s sure good. I explained about
the huge class sizes, and also that it didn’t bother me. It didn’t seem to make my son’s educational
experience any worse than it would be at any other school. Homeschooling wouldn’t be better, Catholic
school wouldn’t be better. Any of our
local public schools wouldn’t be better.
At least I don’t think so.
Why do I feel like I am expected to explain why my kid isn’t
any smarter than other kids? He is.
Why do people keep their smarter kids in schools without
opportunities for them to excel, just because it may make them seem “snobby?”
What if we collectively stopped being so apologetic about
our class sizes and our smart children and our better opportunities?
I don’t know where I’m going here. Just thinking.